mackey v. pollan

March 1st, 2007

Thanks to the DairyQueen, I scored a ticket to the Michael Pollan/John Mackey smackdown in Berkeley the other night. I admit, I hadn’t really followed the controversial Pollan/Mackey dialogue on the web. Nor have I yet read the Omnivore’s Dilemma, although to my credit, I have purchased the book. Nonetheless, here’s a quick recap:

  • Michael Pollan writes a book called the Ominvore’s Dilemma in which he discusses four meals, one of them prepared from ingredients obtained from Whole Foods. Among these ingredients are non-locally produced asparagus from Argentina, with which Pollan is not entirely pleased.
  • John Mackey—founder and CEO of Whole Foods—reads the book and invites Pollan to his office in Austin, Texas. Mackey presents Pollan with an eleven page single-spaced letter in response to the Whole Foods chapter in Pollan’s book, as well as a $25 Whole Foods gift certificate to cover the asparagus.
  • Over the course of months, Mackey and Pollan responsa are published on Mackey’s blog.

The beef:

  • Pollan—Whole Foods supports “Big Organic”, huge factory farms that that adhere to loose organic standards and aren’t much better than non-organic factory farms in terms of humane, sustainable, biodiverse farming. By not buying enough from local farmers, Whole Foods is supporting the large producers rather than small local producers. Some products marketed with illustrious background stories at Whole Foods stores are not what they appear. “Free-range” eggs are packaged with illustrations of an old bucolic farmstead and a touching story about hens who are free to wander and peck outdoors. Some investigative journalism confirmed that these hens are indeed free to roam around the hen house, but have probably not set foot outdoors.
  • Mackey—Au contraire. Whole Foods buys most of its produce from private local farms. The company has been instrumental in helping to set and improve USDA organic standards, and is launching a number of programs to improve the quality of organic farms and food. Mackey admits that Whole Foods mistakenly promoted and sold products from farms they thought were small, private farms based on the accompanying marketing material, which turned out to be products produced by large companies with imaginative marketing departments.

Some salient points from Mackey’s presentation:

  • 78% of produce sold at Whole Foods comes from private family farms, while 22% comes from corporate organic farms.
  • 100% of Whole Foods’ private label milk comes from private family farms.
  • Whole Foods is establishing a 30 million dollar venture capital fund to promote local, artisanal products around the world.
  • Whole Foods has started a program for loaning money to small, local producers.
  • Along with Fair Trade and the Rainforest Alliance, Whole Food will launch the Whole Trade Guarantee—a program guaranteeing quality, price, fair labor, while reducing poverty and enhancing environmental sustainability.

Mackey skirted some issues I felt he should have delved into more openly, such as the high cost of healthy, organic food as a barrier to people who can’t afford it. His argument that Americans are getting richer is really beside the point. Perhaps the US GDP is growing, but I am loath to believe that this wealth is evenly distributed among US citizens. I’m no economist, but I’d bet that those who have money now have even more, while those who don’t still don’t. Mackey argued that Whole Foods can be affordable to those who shop intelligently. Maybe. How about a Whole Foods campaign to prove it? I’d like to see Whole Foods brochures explaining to low-income shoppers how to buy their groceries on a variety of budgets.

Mackey is a man of ideas. He talked at length about his vision for what he calls the ecological era. He noted the negativity of the current organic label—no GMOs, no pesticides, no chemicals, etc.—and called for a more positive organic vision promoting soil health, biodiversity, worker welfare, animal welfare. To achieve this vision, he proposes creating a new farm rating system. A nice idea, but one that will falter without sufficient attention to detail. Much like the idea of promoting small, local producers backfired when Whole Foods mistakenly promoted corporate products with misleading small farm packaging.

On the whole, however, I was impressed by Mackey’s intelligence and passion for ecologically grown food, as well as his openness to receiving and responding to criticism. It was refreshing hearing a CEO who seems to care about something greater than the bottom line. And what a joy to hear an intelligent dialog between people with differing views, instead of the pompous grandstanding that currently passes for debate in this country.

7 Responses to “mackey v. pollan”

  1. Bonnie/Dairy Queen Says:

    nicely done. I think your idea for a Whole Foods campaign to explain to people on a budget how to shop more affordably there is genius, and I may borrow it (but give you credit, don’t worry).

  2. shelly Says:

    Thanks! Feel free. If there’s any chance Whole Foods will hear about it and implement it it’s definitely worth lifting.

  3. Marc Says:

    “Mackey argued that Whole Foods can be affordable to those who shop intelligently. Maybe. How about a Whole Foods campaign to prove it?”

    Great point. He also didn’t address the issue of access to Whole Foods for low income people. How many WFs are in West Oakland or Detroit or the Bronx? In many low income communities, it is a struggle to get any fresh food, often involving riding multiple buses or taking a taxi.

    A great project for one of WF’s foundations or venture capital funds would be a chain of stores in low income neighborhoods that focused on fresh fruit and vegetables, with the goal of selling the produce desired by that community. Or, perhaps, funding projects like the People’s Grocery in Oakland. In the short term, it might lead to a short term loss of revenue, but over time it might open up new opportunities for WF.

  4. shelly Says:

    Marc, an excellent idea. However, I don’t see Whole Foods moving into the Tenderloin anytime soon. There’s an aura about that store much like the aura at Chanel or Versace. Er, not that I’ve been to those stores. Whenever I go to Whole Foods I feel like I’m the only one there who doesn’t have more money than they know what to do with. Like I’m the only one who doesn’t think vacationing in St. Tropez is vulgar because it’s so last year. The only one who doesn’t have a personal shopper, personal assistant, a nanny, a stylist, and a maid from another country whom I count as my token “ethnic” friend.

    Anyway. What they might do is create a “downscale” chain with a different name, one that isn’t associated with forking over lots of money for something you could get cheaper elsewhere. With a good name, a good advertising campaign, and a good inner city location, this just might work.

  5. FARfetched Says:

    The “downscale” chain was my thought too. I’ve heard WF jokingly called “Whole Paycheck,” and there’s not one around my house so I don’t have to worry about it. There’s one about as far (time-wise) from the office as the nearest supermarket to my house, but I certainly don’t have time to go there on my lunch break.

    In the end, it might be more feasible to help low-income people start community gardens or individual container gardens.

  6. shelly Says:

    Hiya fetched :).

    Yeah, Mackey actually joked about the Whole Paycheck moniker. When Pollan brought up the issue, his first response was “you’re not going to give me the ‘Whole Paycheck’ thing, are you?”

    Community or individual gardens are a great idea. 101 cookbooks recently ran a link to a page on the old victory gardens of the 40’s. Those little home gardens fed a lot of Americans back then, cheaply and sustainably.

    I think Marc mentioned People’s Grocery out here in Oakland. They’re a mobile grocery selling fresh organic produce in poor inner city neighborhoods. There’s also Alice Waters’ famous school gardening program in Berkeley. I think this program is also being copied in San Francisco, and perhaps other cities in the Bay Area. It would be great if someone started a national organization to develop such programs in every urban area.

  7. an open cupboard » Blog Archive » michael pollan Says:

    […] « mackey v. pollan […]

Leave a Reply

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.
Creative Commons License